Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump avs to 10.0.5 [WPB-16069] #3290

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

MohamadJaara
Copy link
Member

@MohamadJaara MohamadJaara commented Feb 11, 2025

TaskWPB-16069 [Android] Bump AVS to 10.0.5


PR Submission Checklist for internal contributors

  • The PR Title

    • conforms to the style of semantic commits messages¹ supported in Wire's Github Workflow²
    • contains a reference JIRA issue number like SQPIT-764
    • answers the question: If merged, this PR will: ... ³
  • The PR Description

    • is free of optional paragraphs and you have filled the relevant parts to the best of your ability

What's new in this PR?

Issues

bump avs to 10.0.5

Needs releases with:

  • GitHub link to other pull request

Testing

Test Coverage (Optional)

  • I have added automated test to this contribution

How to Test

Briefly describe how this change was tested and if applicable the exact steps taken to verify that it works as expected.

Notes (Optional)

Specify here any other facts that you think are important for this issue.

Attachments (Optional)

Attachments like images, videos, etc. (drag and drop in the text box)


PR Post Submission Checklist for internal contributors (Optional)

  • Wire's Github Workflow has automatically linked the PR to a JIRA issue

PR Post Merge Checklist for internal contributors

  • If any soft of configuration variable was introduced by this PR, it has been added to the relevant documents and the CI jobs have been updated.

References
  1. https://sparkbox.com/foundry/semantic_commit_messages
  2. https://github.com/wireapp/.github#usage
  3. E.g. feat(conversation-list): Sort conversations by most emojis in the title #SQPIT-764.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Test Results

3 519 tests  ±0   3 411 ✅ ±0   6m 17s ⏱️ +29s
  603 suites ±0     108 💤 ±0 
  603 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d583713. ± Comparison against base commit 00d2335.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@MohamadJaara MohamadJaara changed the title chore: bump avs to 10.0.5 chore: bump avs to 10.0.5 [WPB-16069] Feb 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.86%. Comparing base (00d2335) to head (d583713).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3290   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    50.86%   50.86%           
========================================
  Files         1607     1607           
  Lines        58081    58081           
  Branches      5204     5204           
========================================
  Hits         29540    29540           
+ Misses       26527    26526    -1     
- Partials      2014     2015    +1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 00d2335...d583713. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-wireapp
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: chore/bump-avs-10.0.5
Commit report: b5b307c
Test service: kalium-jvm

✅ 0 Failed, 3411 Passed, 108 Skipped, 59.86s Total Time

@MohamadJaara MohamadJaara added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 12, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit ad0e6a0 Feb 12, 2025
25 of 26 checks passed
@MohamadJaara MohamadJaara deleted the chore/bump-avs-10.0.5 branch February 12, 2025 09:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants